<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172564</link>
    <description>A special summary eviction remedy under Chapter IV-A of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is available only where the landlord lacks a separately usable residential unit in the same locality after vacating government accommodation. In deciding whether the occupied portion is a separate dwelling house, the relevant test is practical and functional: independent enjoyment, access, common facilities, and actual manner of occupation. On that approach, premises capable of separate and independent use do not qualify for the extraordinary procedure. The text also notes that applicability of Chapter IV-A to cantonment-area buildings may be supported by the relevant extension notification under the Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172564</link>
      <description>A special summary eviction remedy under Chapter IV-A of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 is available only where the landlord lacks a separately usable residential unit in the same locality after vacating government accommodation. In deciding whether the occupied portion is a separate dwelling house, the relevant test is practical and functional: independent enjoyment, access, common facilities, and actual manner of occupation. On that approach, premises capable of separate and independent use do not qualify for the extraordinary procedure. The text also notes that applicability of Chapter IV-A to cantonment-area buildings may be supported by the relevant extension notification under the Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>