https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172561 A Cabinet decision does not become enforceable State action unless it is expressed and authenticated in the constitutional form required by Article 166, so a mere ministerial decision cannot by itself found a claim. Article 310(2) is only enabling and does not imply a right to compensation on abolition of a tribunal unless a contract or governing instrument expressly provides for it. Legitimate expectation and the savings clause in the repealing Ordinance could not create compensation liability where no enforceable promise, statutory obligation, or accrued liability existed. The claim for compensation therefore failed on all grounds. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:57:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172561 A Cabinet decision does not become enforceable State action unless it is expressed and authenticated in the constitutional form required by Article 166, so a mere ministerial decision cannot by itself found a claim. Article 310(2) is only enabling and does not imply a right to compensation on abolition of a tribunal unless a contract or governing instrument expressly provides for it. Legitimate expectation and the savings clause in the repealing Ordinance could not create compensation liability where no enforceable promise, statutory obligation, or accrued liability existed. The claim for compensation therefore failed on all grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172561