https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172555 Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is described as permitting State transport nationalisation and restricting private stage carriage operators, while remaining compatible with the Constitution because the measure does not acquire operators' vehicles or assets and renewal of a permit is not a vested right. The text also states that participation in policy formulation by the Secretary who later heard objections under Section 68-D did not, by itself, establish bias or breach of natural justice, absent material showing non-independent decision-making. It further says phased or separate schemes were valid because the statute allowed operation over any area, route, or part thereof. On that basis, the schemes and amendments were upheld. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:56:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172555 Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is described as permitting State transport nationalisation and restricting private stage carriage operators, while remaining compatible with the Constitution because the measure does not acquire operators' vehicles or assets and renewal of a permit is not a vested right. The text also states that participation in policy formulation by the Secretary who later heard objections under Section 68-D did not, by itself, establish bias or breach of natural justice, absent material showing non-independent decision-making. It further says phased or separate schemes were valid because the statute allowed operation over any area, route, or part thereof. On that basis, the schemes and amendments were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172555