<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172553</link>
    <description>Indian citizenship terminates under the Citizenship Act only if foreign citizenship was voluntarily acquired, and that question must be determined through a lawful enquiry under the Citizenship Rules. The statutory scheme places an initial burden on the citizen, permits enquiry by the prescribed authority, and treats foreign passport possession as giving rise to a conclusive presumption only within that framework. Where the citizen alleges compulsion, fraud, or misrepresentation, a fair opportunity must be given to rebut voluntariness before adverse action is taken. The Central Government could not rely on the passport alone, and deportation could not be enforced until citizenship status was determined according to law after proper enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172553</link>
      <description>Indian citizenship terminates under the Citizenship Act only if foreign citizenship was voluntarily acquired, and that question must be determined through a lawful enquiry under the Citizenship Rules. The statutory scheme places an initial burden on the citizen, permits enquiry by the prescribed authority, and treats foreign passport possession as giving rise to a conclusive presumption only within that framework. Where the citizen alleges compulsion, fraud, or misrepresentation, a fair opportunity must be given to rebut voluntariness before adverse action is taken. The Central Government could not rely on the passport alone, and deportation could not be enforced until citizenship status was determined according to law after proper enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>