https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172552 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is determined by the situs of the adjudicating authority that passed the original adjudication order. Applying the principle affirmed in Bombay Snuff Pvt. Ltd. and Ambica Industries, the court noted that the order in issue was passed by the Central Excise Officer under the Indore Commissionerate. The appropriate forum for challenge was therefore the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, not the Delhi High Court, and the applications to withdraw the appeals were allowed so they could be refiled before the competent High Court. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:45:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172552 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is determined by the situs of the adjudicating authority that passed the original adjudication order. Applying the principle affirmed in Bombay Snuff Pvt. Ltd. and Ambica Industries, the court noted that the order in issue was passed by the Central Excise Officer under the Indore Commissionerate. The appropriate forum for challenge was therefore the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, not the Delhi High Court, and the applications to withdraw the appeals were allowed so they could be refiled before the competent High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172552