<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172531</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s finding that the respondent breached the contract by unjustly rescinding it. The appellant was awarded Rs. 2 lakhs for loss of profit, in addition to the amount granted by the High Court, with interest and proportionate costs. The majority of the claims for compensation for loss sustained while executing the work and extra items executed by the contractor were rejected, except for a minimal amount awarded under various sub-heads.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172531</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s finding that the respondent breached the contract by unjustly rescinding it. The appellant was awarded Rs. 2 lakhs for loss of profit, in addition to the amount granted by the High Court, with interest and proportionate costs. The majority of the claims for compensation for loss sustained while executing the work and extra items executed by the contractor were rejected, except for a minimal amount awarded under various sub-heads.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>