https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263035 Writ interference with a pre-deposit order in tax appeals was declined where the assessee had been given repeated opportunities, failed to show financial hardship, and adopted conduct that disentitled it to discretionary relief. The Tribunal found no material error in requiring partial deposit against the tax demand and upheld compliance with the first appellate authority's direction. The High Court further held that Article 226 relief was unwarranted because the pre-deposit condition was limited in scope, the assessee's reply had already been considered, and the resulting dismissal of the appeals did not justify interference. Costs were imposed and the adverse order was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:28:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263035 Writ interference with a pre-deposit order in tax appeals was declined where the assessee had been given repeated opportunities, failed to show financial hardship, and adopted conduct that disentitled it to discretionary relief. The Tribunal found no material error in requiring partial deposit against the tax demand and upheld compliance with the first appellate authority's direction. The High Court further held that Article 226 relief was unwarranted because the pre-deposit condition was limited in scope, the assessee's reply had already been considered, and the resulting dismissal of the appeals did not justify interference. Costs were imposed and the adverse order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263035