https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263028 A party supplying rectified spirit under an unchallenged Government Order fixing the price could not later resist recovery of the State's stipulated share when the demand was made in accordance with that arrangement. The challenge was confined to the recovery notice, while the supplier had accepted the rate structure and supplied the goods with full knowledge that Rs. 1 per litre was payable to the State. The absence of transportation expenses did not alter the agreed price mechanism. The Supreme Court therefore upheld the demand and rejected the collateral attack on the underlying price-fixing arrangement. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263028 A party supplying rectified spirit under an unchallenged Government Order fixing the price could not later resist recovery of the State's stipulated share when the demand was made in accordance with that arrangement. The challenge was confined to the recovery notice, while the supplier had accepted the rate structure and supplied the goods with full knowledge that Rs. 1 per litre was payable to the State. The absence of transportation expenses did not alter the agreed price mechanism. The Supreme Court therefore upheld the demand and rejected the collateral attack on the underlying price-fixing arrangement. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263028