<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 941 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263024</link>
    <description>Fabric classification under the Central Excise Tariff remained governed by the earlier affirmed view that the goods fell under Chapter Heading 52.06 and not Heading 59.06. Because the present appeal raised the same classification question already settled in the earlier matter, no independent merit survived for consideration and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 941 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263024</link>
      <description>Fabric classification under the Central Excise Tariff remained governed by the earlier affirmed view that the goods fell under Chapter Heading 52.06 and not Heading 59.06. Because the present appeal raised the same classification question already settled in the earlier matter, no independent merit survived for consideration and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>