<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 933 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263016</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of the appellant, Vedica Procon Private Limited, with costs, holding that the High Court was not justified in recalling the order confirming the sale. The Court reaffirmed that subsequent higher offers cannot invalidate a confirmed sale, emphasizing procedural fairness and finality in judicial sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 933 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263016</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of the appellant, Vedica Procon Private Limited, with costs, holding that the High Court was not justified in recalling the order confirming the sale. The Court reaffirmed that subsequent higher offers cannot invalidate a confirmed sale, emphasizing procedural fairness and finality in judicial sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>