https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263013 The court quashed the orders disposing of objections against the initiation of reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the requirement for the Assessing Officer (AO) to address objections on merits before proceeding with reassessment. The court found the AO's failure to consider objections on merits and reliance on time limits for filing returns as incorrect. The court referred to relevant judgments and remanded the matters to the AO to address objections on merits within two months. The court did not express an opinion on the validity of notices under Section 148 or objections against reassessment. en-us Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263013 The court quashed the orders disposing of objections against the initiation of reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the requirement for the Assessing Officer (AO) to address objections on merits before proceeding with reassessment. The court found the AO's failure to consider objections on merits and reliance on time limits for filing returns as incorrect. The court referred to relevant judgments and remanded the matters to the AO to address objections on merits within two months. The court did not express an opinion on the validity of notices under Section 148 or objections against reassessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263013