<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 912 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262995</link>
    <description>Charitable registration under section 12AA cannot be denied to a minority educational society merely because it admits some non-minority students, unless the facts show a prohibited benefit to a particular community or a non-genuine commercial motive. Allegations about building fund, caution money, and interest-free advances were not enough, on the stated facts, to defeat charitable character. Fresh reassessment under section 147 was also treated as permissible where the earlier annulment arose only from a jurisdictional defect in notice service and the merits of escapement had not been finally decided; pending appeal did not bar a new initiation. The registration issue favoured the society, while the reassessment challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 912 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262995</link>
      <description>Charitable registration under section 12AA cannot be denied to a minority educational society merely because it admits some non-minority students, unless the facts show a prohibited benefit to a particular community or a non-genuine commercial motive. Allegations about building fund, caution money, and interest-free advances were not enough, on the stated facts, to defeat charitable character. Fresh reassessment under section 147 was also treated as permissible where the earlier annulment arose only from a jurisdictional defect in notice service and the merits of escapement had not been finally decided; pending appeal did not bar a new initiation. The registration issue favoured the society, while the reassessment challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>