https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172523 A writ court should not extend an expired mining sub-lease as a form of specific performance where the relief would be impractical, require re-establishing mining infrastructure for a short residual term, conflict with policy against granting leases to private parties, and risk perpetuating irregularities. Although the dispute had a statutory public law element because it arose from cancellation of sub-leases and withdrawal of consent under the mining regime, the High Court's order restoring mining operations and extending the sub-lease period was set aside. The claim for damages was not decided and was left open for separate civil adjudication. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172523 A writ court should not extend an expired mining sub-lease as a form of specific performance where the relief would be impractical, require re-establishing mining infrastructure for a short residual term, conflict with policy against granting leases to private parties, and risk perpetuating irregularities. Although the dispute had a statutory public law element because it arose from cancellation of sub-leases and withdrawal of consent under the mining regime, the High Court's order restoring mining operations and extending the sub-lease period was set aside. The claim for damages was not decided and was left open for separate civil adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172523