<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the case to the AO to verify the Municipal rateable value. If the rateable value is below Rs. 3,60,000, the actual rent received will be taxed; otherwise, the matter will be decided as per law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the annual value under section 23(1)(a) cannot exceed the Municipal valuation, aligning with precedent cases and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:40:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the case to the AO to verify the Municipal rateable value. If the rateable value is below Rs. 3,60,000, the actual rent received will be taxed; otherwise, the matter will be decided as per law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the annual value under section 23(1)(a) cannot exceed the Municipal valuation, aligning with precedent cases and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>