<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172520</link>
    <description>A criminal judgment is not invalid merely because only the operative part was pronounced, where the decision was formally delivered in open court and no prejudice or failure of justice is shown. Voluntary confessions recorded under Section 15 of TADA remained admissible against the maker and co-accused, including pre-1993 amendment confessions, subject to statutory safeguards and proof of voluntariness. The grant of pardon to the approver was upheld, and his evidence was accepted as credible and corroborated. On the total evidence, including confessions, recoveries, travel documents and supporting witnesses, the prosecution proved the conspiracy and the appellant&#039;s role beyond reasonable doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172520</link>
      <description>A criminal judgment is not invalid merely because only the operative part was pronounced, where the decision was formally delivered in open court and no prejudice or failure of justice is shown. Voluntary confessions recorded under Section 15 of TADA remained admissible against the maker and co-accused, including pre-1993 amendment confessions, subject to statutory safeguards and proof of voluntariness. The grant of pardon to the approver was upheld, and his evidence was accepted as credible and corroborated. On the total evidence, including confessions, recoveries, travel documents and supporting witnesses, the prosecution proved the conspiracy and the appellant&#039;s role beyond reasonable doubt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>