https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172512 In second appeal, findings of fact on a landlord's bona fide personal requirement, based on appreciation of pleadings and testimony, cannot be disturbed by reappreciation of evidence unless the High Court identifies a substantial question of law or the findings are shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. The SC held that the High Court exceeded the limits of Section 100 CPC by substituting its own view without framing such a question, so the challenge to the eviction decree failed and the first appellate court's decree was restored. en-us Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:28:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172512 In second appeal, findings of fact on a landlord's bona fide personal requirement, based on appreciation of pleadings and testimony, cannot be disturbed by reappreciation of evidence unless the High Court identifies a substantial question of law or the findings are shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. The SC held that the High Court exceeded the limits of Section 100 CPC by substituting its own view without framing such a question, so the challenge to the eviction decree failed and the first appellate court's decree was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172512