https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172509 An order of requisition is not invalid merely because it omits an express recital of public purpose, if that purpose is otherwise established. Requisition is inherently temporary and cannot be continued for an indefinite or unreasonably long period; where the underlying purpose is permanent or effectively so, acquisition rather than requisition is required. A requisition lasting about 30 years was treated as an abuse of the requisitioning power and as a de facto acquisition without lawful acquisition proceedings. Payment of rent by the allottee to the original owner, even if accepted, did not create a direct tenancy or displace the requisition. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172509 An order of requisition is not invalid merely because it omits an express recital of public purpose, if that purpose is otherwise established. Requisition is inherently temporary and cannot be continued for an indefinite or unreasonably long period; where the underlying purpose is permanent or effectively so, acquisition rather than requisition is required. A requisition lasting about 30 years was treated as an abuse of the requisitioning power and as a de facto acquisition without lawful acquisition proceedings. Payment of rent by the allottee to the original owner, even if accepted, did not create a direct tenancy or displace the requisition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172509