<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172504</link>
    <description>A decision under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure operates as a decree, so an appeal against it must be accompanied by a certified copy under Order 41 Rule 1; the appellate court cannot waive that requirement, and the appeal is defective without the copy. Delay in filing the certified copy and re-filing may still be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, particularly if the delay is not due to negligence, inaction, or lack of bona fides. On the stated facts, repeated attempts to obtain the copy and administrative errors justified condonation, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 116 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172504</link>
      <description>A decision under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure operates as a decree, so an appeal against it must be accompanied by a certified copy under Order 41 Rule 1; the appellate court cannot waive that requirement, and the appeal is defective without the copy. Delay in filing the certified copy and re-filing may still be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, particularly if the delay is not due to negligence, inaction, or lack of bona fides. On the stated facts, repeated attempts to obtain the copy and administrative errors justified condonation, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>