https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172494 A tribunal's review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds analogous to Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, so a later judgment or subsequent governmental memorandum cannot by itself justify reopening a concluded order. A review is not a substitute for appeal and must rest on material existing when the original decision was made; the Tribunal therefore acted beyond jurisdiction in allowing review on that basis. On the pay-scale claim, no legally sustainable case of discrimination or stagnation was shown because the employees had already received promotions and the later addition of posts did not make the earlier denial arbitrary. The contrary orders were set aside and the original rejection restored. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2025 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172494 A tribunal's review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds analogous to Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, so a later judgment or subsequent governmental memorandum cannot by itself justify reopening a concluded order. A review is not a substitute for appeal and must rest on material existing when the original decision was made; the Tribunal therefore acted beyond jurisdiction in allowing review on that basis. On the pay-scale claim, no legally sustainable case of discrimination or stagnation was shown because the employees had already received promotions and the later addition of posts did not make the earlier denial arbitrary. The contrary orders were set aside and the original rejection restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172494