<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262983</link>
    <description>Cancellation of registration under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax framework was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the dispute turned on rival factual claims about lease documents and those facts were already in issue before the civil court. The text notes that cancellation may be made only for good and sufficient reasons, after notice and opportunity of hearing, and that the petitioner had filed objections before the order. It also records that an alternative appellate or revisional remedy existed under the statute, making the civil suits the appropriate forum for resolving the underlying factual controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262983</link>
      <description>Cancellation of registration under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax framework was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the dispute turned on rival factual claims about lease documents and those facts were already in issue before the civil court. The text notes that cancellation may be made only for good and sufficient reasons, after notice and opportunity of hearing, and that the petitioner had filed objections before the order. It also records that an alternative appellate or revisional remedy existed under the statute, making the civil suits the appropriate forum for resolving the underlying factual controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>