<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 880 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee, stating that there was no apparent mistake in the original order. The claim for exemption under Section 11 was not raised at any stage of the original proceedings, and therefore, it could not be considered as an apparent mistake eligible for rectification under Section 254(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 880 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee, stating that there was no apparent mistake in the original order. The claim for exemption under Section 11 was not raised at any stage of the original proceedings, and therefore, it could not be considered as an apparent mistake eligible for rectification under Section 254(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>