<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 879 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) provided clear and categorical findings on the lack of relationship, occasion, and creditworthiness of the donor, as well as the failure to establish the source of funds for the investment in immovable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 879 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) provided clear and categorical findings on the lack of relationship, occasion, and creditworthiness of the donor, as well as the failure to establish the source of funds for the investment in immovable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>