<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 870 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the long-term capital loss and the write-off as a capital expenditure. The Tribunal found the transactions lacked genuineness and did not meet the criteria for business loss deductions under the Income Tax Act. The decision stressed the necessity of providing substantial evidence and meeting statutory requirements for claiming deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 870 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of the long-term capital loss and the write-off as a capital expenditure. The Tribunal found the transactions lacked genuineness and did not meet the criteria for business loss deductions under the Income Tax Act. The decision stressed the necessity of providing substantial evidence and meeting statutory requirements for claiming deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>