https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262946 Section 35F of the Central Excise Act requires compliance with a pre-deposit condition before an appeal can proceed. Where a stay order directs deposit of a specified amount, the pendency of a writ petition or Civil Miscellaneous Appeal does not by itself suspend that obligation. In the absence of any interim High Court order staying the pre-deposit requirement, non-compliance remains effective and the appeals are liable to be dismissed. The practical effect is that a party challenging the stay order must produce a subsisting interim order to avoid dismissal for default of pre-deposit. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:02:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262946 Section 35F of the Central Excise Act requires compliance with a pre-deposit condition before an appeal can proceed. Where a stay order directs deposit of a specified amount, the pendency of a writ petition or Civil Miscellaneous Appeal does not by itself suspend that obligation. In the absence of any interim High Court order staying the pre-deposit requirement, non-compliance remains effective and the appeals are liable to be dismissed. The practical effect is that a party challenging the stay order must produce a subsisting interim order to avoid dismissal for default of pre-deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262946