<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Case Sent Back for Fresh Review on Service Valuation and Material Cost Inclusion. Evidence Reassessment Required.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24361</link>
    <description>Valuation of service - Inclusion / exclusion of value of the materials supplied - Since the issue relates to verification of factual details, we are of the considered view that the matter has to go back before the adjudicating authority for consideration afresh of all the documentary evidences - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:29:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Case Sent Back for Fresh Review on Service Valuation and Material Cost Inclusion. Evidence Reassessment Required.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24361</link>
      <description>Valuation of service - Inclusion / exclusion of value of the materials supplied - Since the issue relates to verification of factual details, we are of the considered view that the matter has to go back before the adjudicating authority for consideration afresh of all the documentary evidences - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:29:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>