<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 509 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172489</link>
    <description>Regulation 12 of the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 treats internal assessment as a separate component: it is an eligibility condition for appearing in the university examination and carries its own 20% weightage in the total subject marks. The Regulation also prescribes distinct passing heads, including 50% in the aggregate, 50% in theory with orals, and 50% in practicals. Internal assessment marks could not be clubbed with university examination marks for theory and practical passing criteria because the text did not authorise such aggregation. Clauses 56(2) and 57 of the University Ordinance were held consistent with Regulation 12, and the contrary clarification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 509 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172489</link>
      <description>Regulation 12 of the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 treats internal assessment as a separate component: it is an eligibility condition for appearing in the university examination and carries its own 20% weightage in the total subject marks. The Regulation also prescribes distinct passing heads, including 50% in the aggregate, 50% in theory with orals, and 50% in practicals. Internal assessment marks could not be clubbed with university examination marks for theory and practical passing criteria because the text did not authorise such aggregation. Clauses 56(2) and 57 of the University Ordinance were held consistent with Regulation 12, and the contrary clarification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>