https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172482 The majority judgment in the case overruled the preliminary objection, allowing the appeal to proceed to a hearing on its merits, with costs to be borne in the appeal. However, Justice Sarkar dissented, arguing that the appellant, by accepting the benefits of the decree, should not be allowed to challenge its validity. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2026 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172482 The majority judgment in the case overruled the preliminary objection, allowing the appeal to proceed to a hearing on its merits, with costs to be borne in the appeal. However, Justice Sarkar dissented, arguing that the appellant, by accepting the benefits of the decree, should not be allowed to challenge its validity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172482