https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172472 Writ jurisdiction is equitable and demands full disclosure and clean hands. Where a litigant files repeated writ petitions arising from the same recovery controversy, the court may treat the later petition as suppression of material facts and abuse of process, even if the prayers differ or the matter arises at different stages of the recovery action. The earlier and connected proceedings had already raised the real dispute concerning recovery of the loan amount and the challenge to the recovery machinery, including the validity of Section 35A of the U.P. Khadi & Village Industries Board Act, 1960. The later petition was not accepted as presenting a distinct cause of action and was liable to be dismissed. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172472 Writ jurisdiction is equitable and demands full disclosure and clean hands. Where a litigant files repeated writ petitions arising from the same recovery controversy, the court may treat the later petition as suppression of material facts and abuse of process, even if the prayers differ or the matter arises at different stages of the recovery action. The earlier and connected proceedings had already raised the real dispute concerning recovery of the loan amount and the challenge to the recovery machinery, including the validity of Section 35A of the U.P. Khadi & Village Industries Board Act, 1960. The later petition was not accepted as presenting a distinct cause of action and was liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172472