https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172465 The expression "owner" in Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is described as a broad, contextual concept and not absolute ownership of both land and structure. A landlord who built the premises and remains in possession under a subsisting long lease of the land may be treated as owner vis-a -vis the tenant for bona fide requirement eviction. The text further notes that a notice cancelling the underlying lease did not, on the facts, show completed termination or dispossession, and the main portion of the premises stood on land where no real title cloud was shown. The eviction order was therefore sustained on bona fide need. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:02:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172465 The expression "owner" in Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is described as a broad, contextual concept and not absolute ownership of both land and structure. A landlord who built the premises and remains in possession under a subsisting long lease of the land may be treated as owner vis-a -vis the tenant for bona fide requirement eviction. The text further notes that a notice cancelling the underlying lease did not, on the facts, show completed termination or dispossession, and the main portion of the premises stood on land where no real title cloud was shown. The eviction order was therefore sustained on bona fide need. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172465