https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262934 The court dismissed the application for recall of an order dated 23 July 2009 by the revenue, emphasizing the lack of justification for the 980-day delay in taking action. The court found the application misconceived as the order did not dismiss the appeals, and criticized the revenue's conduct for failing to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The judgment highlights the importance of timely and diligent action in legal proceedings, underscoring the need for parties to promptly address court directives and avoid undue delays. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:54:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262934 The court dismissed the application for recall of an order dated 23 July 2009 by the revenue, emphasizing the lack of justification for the 980-day delay in taking action. The court found the application misconceived as the order did not dismiss the appeals, and criticized the revenue's conduct for failing to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The judgment highlights the importance of timely and diligent action in legal proceedings, underscoring the need for parties to promptly address court directives and avoid undue delays. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262934