<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that income from the sale and purchase of shares and securities should be classified as &#039;capital gains.&#039; Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the entire addition made for unexplained investment in the property acquisition, as the difference in stated consideration was justified, and there was no evidence of undisclosed investment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:54:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that income from the sale and purchase of shares and securities should be classified as &#039;capital gains.&#039; Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the entire addition made for unexplained investment in the property acquisition, as the difference in stated consideration was justified, and there was no evidence of undisclosed investment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>