https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262913 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of duty and penalty. The appellant's availing of CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices was deemed valid, following a similar case precedent. The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable for the wrongful credit availment, as the provisions invoked were inapplicable. Consequently, the demand of irregular CENVAT credit was vacated, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. en-us Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:52:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262913 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of duty and penalty. The appellant's availing of CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices was deemed valid, following a similar case precedent. The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable for the wrongful credit availment, as the provisions invoked were inapplicable. Consequently, the demand of irregular CENVAT credit was vacated, providing the appellant with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262913