https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262890 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, ruling in favor of the respondent M/s. J.K. Furnishers. The Tribunal found that the price charged by the respondent, as indicated in purchase orders and invoices, was inclusive of all taxes, entitling them to the benefit under Section 4 (4) (d) (ii) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the total value received should be considered as cum tax, leading to no fault in the adjudicating authority's order. en-us Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262890 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, ruling in favor of the respondent M/s. J.K. Furnishers. The Tribunal found that the price charged by the respondent, as indicated in purchase orders and invoices, was inclusive of all taxes, entitling them to the benefit under Section 4 (4) (d) (ii) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the total value received should be considered as cum tax, leading to no fault in the adjudicating authority's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262890