https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172456 A contempt petition was held not to be time-barred under section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 so far as it challenged the application dated 14 December 1972, because the allegation covered a continuing course of conduct rather than an isolated earlier filing. The Court further held that repeated applications used to bypass prior orders, avoid compliance, and delay pending proceedings amounted to abuse of process and criminal contempt under section 2(c), as they interfered with the due course and administration of justice. The contempt finding was made against the respondents and a fine was imposed. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2022 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172456 A contempt petition was held not to be time-barred under section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 so far as it challenged the application dated 14 December 1972, because the allegation covered a continuing course of conduct rather than an isolated earlier filing. The Court further held that repeated applications used to bypass prior orders, avoid compliance, and delay pending proceedings amounted to abuse of process and criminal contempt under section 2(c), as they interfered with the due course and administration of justice. The contempt finding was made against the respondents and a fine was imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172456