<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1369 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to tax the profit from the sale of mutual funds as capital gains, not business income, based on the nature of the investments. Regarding the disallowance of expenses under section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the matter for the Assessing Officer to determine the disallowance in accordance with a Bombay High Court decision, stating Rule 8D should not be applied retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1369 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to tax the profit from the sale of mutual funds as capital gains, not business income, based on the nature of the investments. Regarding the disallowance of expenses under section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the matter for the Assessing Officer to determine the disallowance in accordance with a Bombay High Court decision, stating Rule 8D should not be applied retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>