<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 733 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 82,12,000/- under Section 68 for unexplained share money and loans. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently demonstrated the source of funds and the genuineness of the transactions, and the Assessing Officer had failed to provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s well-reasoned and legally correct decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 733 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 82,12,000/- under Section 68 for unexplained share money and loans. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently demonstrated the source of funds and the genuineness of the transactions, and the Assessing Officer had failed to provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s well-reasoned and legally correct decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>