<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 630 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172442</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of jurisdiction under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 was dismissed. The Tribunal correctly interpreted the Proviso to Section 129A, which prohibits appeals regarding goods imported or exported as baggage. The appellant, a Customs Superintendent, failed to show any error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdictional ruling. Other legal remedies were noted as available despite the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 630 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172442</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of jurisdiction under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 was dismissed. The Tribunal correctly interpreted the Proviso to Section 129A, which prohibits appeals regarding goods imported or exported as baggage. The appellant, a Customs Superintendent, failed to show any error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdictional ruling. Other legal remedies were noted as available despite the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>