<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172441</link>
    <description>A stale service claim cannot be revived by making a belated representation and then challenging only the rejection of that representation; the later representation does not create a fresh cause of action, and delay or laches attached to the original claim remains fatal. Completion of 10 years&#039; service does not, by itself, confer a right to pension; the qualifying-service rule operates only for computation where pensionary entitlement otherwise exists under the pension rules and does not dispense with the substantive conditions for pension. On both issues, the claim based on delay and the asserted service length was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172441</link>
      <description>A stale service claim cannot be revived by making a belated representation and then challenging only the rejection of that representation; the later representation does not create a fresh cause of action, and delay or laches attached to the original claim remains fatal. Completion of 10 years&#039; service does not, by itself, confer a right to pension; the qualifying-service rule operates only for computation where pensionary entitlement otherwise exists under the pension rules and does not dispense with the substantive conditions for pension. On both issues, the claim based on delay and the asserted service length was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>