https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172440 A special limitation period fixed by a special law is subject to Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963, including Section 5, unless the special law expressly excludes their operation. For an application for special leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 417(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, the absence of express exclusion meant that delay could be condoned on showing sufficient cause. Mere mandatory wording in the special provision was insufficient to displace Section 5, and the earlier exclusionary rule under the Limitation Act, 1908 did not control the position under the 1963 Act. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172440 A special limitation period fixed by a special law is subject to Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963, including Section 5, unless the special law expressly excludes their operation. For an application for special leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 417(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, the absence of express exclusion meant that delay could be condoned on showing sufficient cause. Mere mandatory wording in the special provision was insufficient to displace Section 5, and the earlier exclusionary rule under the Limitation Act, 1908 did not control the position under the 1963 Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172440