<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1289 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172426</link>
    <description>An earlier Supreme Court ruling was treated as binding precedent on the same point in controversy, and the appellant accepted that the issue had already been decided against it in Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore v. Jawahar Mills Ltd. The Court therefore held that no further consideration of the identical question was possible in these civil appeals. As the controversy stood concluded by the prior decision, the appeals did not survive and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1289 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172426</link>
      <description>An earlier Supreme Court ruling was treated as binding precedent on the same point in controversy, and the appellant accepted that the issue had already been decided against it in Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore v. Jawahar Mills Ltd. The Court therefore held that no further consideration of the identical question was possible in these civil appeals. As the controversy stood concluded by the prior decision, the appeals did not survive and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>