https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172423 The appeal was dismissed because the issue raised was already squarely covered by this Court's earlier judgment in M/s. Majestic Mobikes (P) Ltd. The Court treated the prior decision as binding precedent governing the controversy, found no merit in re-agitating the same question, and rejected the appeal on that basis. The connected miscellaneous civil application was also dismissed as unnecessary. en-us Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:34:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172423 The appeal was dismissed because the issue raised was already squarely covered by this Court's earlier judgment in M/s. Majestic Mobikes (P) Ltd. The Court treated the prior decision as binding precedent governing the controversy, found no merit in re-agitating the same question, and rejected the appeal on that basis. The connected miscellaneous civil application was also dismissed as unnecessary. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172423