<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1053 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172408</link>
    <description>A contractual pre-arbitral procedure was treated as complied with where the correspondence showed repeated attempts at discussion and negotiation before the notice invoking arbitration, so the objection for non-compliance failed. The arbitration clause was held separable from the underlying contract, and allegations that the contract was void, procured by fraud, or linked to pending criminal proceedings did not bar reference to arbitration; such disputes were left to the arbitral tribunal under a minimal-intervention approach. The disputes were referred to arbitration and an arbitral tribunal was constituted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:04:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1053 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172408</link>
      <description>A contractual pre-arbitral procedure was treated as complied with where the correspondence showed repeated attempts at discussion and negotiation before the notice invoking arbitration, so the objection for non-compliance failed. The arbitration clause was held separable from the underlying contract, and allegations that the contract was void, procured by fraud, or linked to pending criminal proceedings did not bar reference to arbitration; such disputes were left to the arbitral tribunal under a minimal-intervention approach. The disputes were referred to arbitration and an arbitral tribunal was constituted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>