<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 800 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262883</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for further verification of debit notes used by the appellants to claim Cenvat credit. The authority was directed to consider the judgments cited by the appellants in support of their claim. The appeal was allowed for denovo adjudication, emphasizing the need for proper examination of the debit notes lacking essential information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 800 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262883</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for further verification of debit notes used by the appellants to claim Cenvat credit. The authority was directed to consider the judgments cited by the appellants in support of their claim. The appeal was allowed for denovo adjudication, emphasizing the need for proper examination of the debit notes lacking essential information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>