https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262873 The appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the orders setting aside the demand and penalty imposed on the respondent for alleged clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise Duty was dismissed. The court emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and the unjust imposition of demand and penalty solely based on a retracted confessional statement. The judgment upheld the orders setting aside the demand and penalty, stressing the importance of proper verification and consideration of the respondent's defense in such cases. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262873 The appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the orders setting aside the demand and penalty imposed on the respondent for alleged clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise Duty was dismissed. The court emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and the unjust imposition of demand and penalty solely based on a retracted confessional statement. The judgment upheld the orders setting aside the demand and penalty, stressing the importance of proper verification and consideration of the respondent's defense in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262873