<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 789 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262872</link>
    <description>Concurrent factual findings treating an industrial unit as a dummy or paper concern will not be interfered with in tax appeal unless they are perverse, ex facie illegal, or ignore material evidence; on the record described, no such infirmity was shown. A challenge that the Tribunal exceeded the show cause notice fails where the essential factual basis of the demand and the dummy-arrangement allegation were already set out in the notice and supporting material; the reasoning remained within the original controversy. The appeal therefore disclosed no substantial question of law and the Revenue&#039;s case was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 789 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262872</link>
      <description>Concurrent factual findings treating an industrial unit as a dummy or paper concern will not be interfered with in tax appeal unless they are perverse, ex facie illegal, or ignore material evidence; on the record described, no such infirmity was shown. A challenge that the Tribunal exceeded the show cause notice fails where the essential factual basis of the demand and the dummy-arrangement allegation were already set out in the notice and supporting material; the reasoning remained within the original controversy. The appeal therefore disclosed no substantial question of law and the Revenue&#039;s case was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>