https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262867 The SC dismissed the appeals on the ground that the tax effect was nominal, and therefore declined to enter into the substantive merits of the issues raised. Because the monetary consequence was negligible, the Court exercised discretion not to adjudicate the legal questions in the appeals. The underlying question of law was expressly left open and remains available for consideration in appropriate future proceedings. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Aug 2015 07:57:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262867 The SC dismissed the appeals on the ground that the tax effect was nominal, and therefore declined to enter into the substantive merits of the issues raised. Because the monetary consequence was negligible, the Court exercised discretion not to adjudicate the legal questions in the appeals. The underlying question of law was expressly left open and remains available for consideration in appropriate future proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262867