https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262864 The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to cross-examine witnesses, emphasizing the importance of this right in ensuring fair adjudication. The court highlighted the necessity of providing the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses as a fundamental aspect of fair proceedings, citing relevant legal precedents. The respondent was instructed to pass appropriate orders within 45 days. The writ petitions were allowed based on the violation of natural justice principles, ensuring the petitioner's right to defend their case through cross-examination. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262864 The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to cross-examine witnesses, emphasizing the importance of this right in ensuring fair adjudication. The court highlighted the necessity of providing the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses as a fundamental aspect of fair proceedings, citing relevant legal precedents. The respondent was instructed to pass appropriate orders within 45 days. The writ petitions were allowed based on the violation of natural justice principles, ensuring the petitioner's right to defend their case through cross-examination. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262864