<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 776 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262859</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on five appellants for violating SEBI Regulations by failing to make mandatory disclosures within the required timeframe. Despite arguments of technical irregularities and absence of share trading during the relevant period, the tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of disclosure requirements, the lack of a valid explanation for the delay, and the principle of proportionality in penalty determination. The decision stressed the significance of timely and accurate disclosures in the securities market to maintain transparency and safeguard investor interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 776 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262859</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on five appellants for violating SEBI Regulations by failing to make mandatory disclosures within the required timeframe. Despite arguments of technical irregularities and absence of share trading during the relevant period, the tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of disclosure requirements, the lack of a valid explanation for the delay, and the principle of proportionality in penalty determination. The decision stressed the significance of timely and accurate disclosures in the securities market to maintain transparency and safeguard investor interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>