<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 754 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department against separate orders of ld. CIT (A) for A.Y. 2008-09 through a consolidated order. The decision was based on the interpretation of the proviso in sec. 54EC(1) regarding the investment limit for deduction u/s. 54EC, emphasizing a liberal approach in favor of the taxpayer. The Tribunal clarified that the amendment in Sec. 54EC from A.Y. 2015-16 onwards did not apply to the relevant assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeals on 10th February 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 754 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department against separate orders of ld. CIT (A) for A.Y. 2008-09 through a consolidated order. The decision was based on the interpretation of the proviso in sec. 54EC(1) regarding the investment limit for deduction u/s. 54EC, emphasizing a liberal approach in favor of the taxpayer. The Tribunal clarified that the amendment in Sec. 54EC from A.Y. 2015-16 onwards did not apply to the relevant assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeals on 10th February 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>