<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 452 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172402</link>
    <description>A party who participates before an authority without raising a jurisdictional objection cannot later impeach the decision on that ground after an adverse result. An order passed pursuant to a superior court&#039;s direction remains binding until set aside in appropriate proceedings, and a supposed defect in its basis does not make it void or ignorable. A complaint based on receipt of an argument note was also rejected because it did not constitute undisclosed adverse material and could be answered before the Court. The text further notes that, where a retired employee&#039;s punishment may affect pension entitlement, limited relief may be considered by directing examination of whether conversion of the punishment into compulsory retirement is possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 452 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172402</link>
      <description>A party who participates before an authority without raising a jurisdictional objection cannot later impeach the decision on that ground after an adverse result. An order passed pursuant to a superior court&#039;s direction remains binding until set aside in appropriate proceedings, and a supposed defect in its basis does not make it void or ignorable. A complaint based on receipt of an argument note was also rejected because it did not constitute undisclosed adverse material and could be answered before the Court. The text further notes that, where a retired employee&#039;s punishment may affect pension entitlement, limited relief may be considered by directing examination of whether conversion of the punishment into compulsory retirement is possible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>